RSS

Author Archives: JPFmovies

Unknown's avatar

About JPFmovies

We here at JPFmovies pride ourselves at talking a hard, gritty look at entertainment from all over the world.

This Movie is like an old friend–“Real Men” Jim Belushi and John Ritter.

Real Men (1987) starring John Ritter and Jim Belushi is an unknown quantity to many.  The movie didn’t do anything in the theaters, and get at best very infrequent airings on cable movie channels, but is has become a sort of cult classic (yes I agree that term is overused).  I normally reject movies with severe logic deficiencies—even comedies but Real Men has a special place in the comedy section of my DVD collection.  A movie like Real Men for many people is actually quite difficult to like.  Some might say it falls in the same class as “Hudson Hawk,” a different spoof that is as much vilified by its critics as it is glorified by its fans.  As for me and many of my friends, Real Men was an absolutely hilarious experience.

Belushi plays a womanizing super CIA agent who has to take Ritter, a less than average suburbanite, across the country to give aliens a glass of water in exchange for “the good package” or “the big gun.”  On the trip they have so many completely eccentric situations happening to them that I couldn’t help but be entertained.  Today the “zany” adventures of many so-called comedies are so strained that they are beyond being “not funny” and reach into the realm of annoying.  However Real Men has such an air of informality about it, that the films outlandish circumstances were seamless and even got this hardened cynic to suspend belief and laugh until there were tears in my eyes.

This one is definitely a rose, but a tough one to find.

 
9 Comments

Posted by on December 12, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Well Since We Are Discussing T.V. That Still Should Be In Production . . .

Well Since We Are Discussing T.V. That Still Should Be In Production . . .  I would like to bring up a show that was taken off the air after three seasons:  Arrested Development.  While I don’t have “regular” TV, nor have I for about 5 years now, I still managed to keep up with Arrested Development.  When I heard that show was being prematurely canceled after three seasons several items became apparent to me.  First is that in general Americans are dim-witted and could not follow the many jokes, quips and otherwise hilarious dialogue that pervaded the show.  When I asked my stepdaughter Emma what she thought about my position she said “I don’t know.”  Well neither do I.

Rarely have I ever seen a show that was so well cast and the actors were so in sync with each other.  Yes you had to pay attention during the show to get all of the jokes  and other witty sarcasm, but that was almost as fun as the comedy itself.  Perhaps all of the studies “they” (who ever they are) may have a point when they say that Americans have lost any form of concentration or attention span. 

Anyways, because Arrested Development went for three seasons, I decided to put one clip from each season onto this post for your enjoyment.  Let’s hope that more, and not less, shows like Arrested Development are syndicated in the future do not become relics.

 
12 Comments

Posted by on December 3, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Yes-Minister & Yes-Prime Minister Are British Shows That Should Still Be In Production.

The Brits have the full spectrum when it comes to TV series, some clearly belong in the dung heap, some are not crap and a few are even roses.  Yes Minister and its sequel Yes Prime Minister are roses by any other name.  Each series ran for only three seasons (very typical of the BBC) and were immensely popular in England as well as Europe.  Because it is English/European you will have the added benefit of coming off as very cosmopolitan when discussing it with friends.

The show is a satire of the bureaucratic civil service that typifies the workings of government.  The series has been described as a “closely observed portrayal of what goes on in the corridors of power [and] has given me hours of pure joy.”  Rt. Hon. Margaret Thatcher MP.   The three main characters Sir. Humphrey (head of the civil service), Bernhard (the minister’s private secretary) and Jim Hacker (the minister of administrative affairs) are trying to out maneuver each other in formulating and implementing clearly ridiculous government policies.  The supporting cast is equally as humorous as the “big three” in their involvement with the consistent tug-of-war between the civil service and the elected officials.

Both series are worthy of watching and each deserve a rose.

 
7 Comments

Posted by on November 14, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Whenever a Cuban Revolution Occurs Take Advantage of it and Make a Movie.

I am not a big Woody Allen fan; in fact most of his movies are dung heap material. Allen’s voice is whiny and annoying, and the “I’m eccentric and Jewish” routine gets old fast.  However, there is one particular piece that borders between not crap and a rose: Bananas.  A parody of Castro and the Cuban revolution, most of this movie is actually quite funny and entertaining.  Perhaps the best parts are the cameo appearances by Howard Cosell who applied his trademark “telling it like it is” sports commentary technique outside its typical milieu and into the realm of banana republic assignations and the consummation of the marriage between Allen and Farrow at the end of the movie.  If only Allen could have worked Cosell into his other movies, maybe he would now have a career worth looking back upon. We might even have given him a pass on the Sun Yi episode. As it is, I am left with the impression that Allen has still not fully explored the comic potential of the Cuban Revolution. This movie was good, but in the hands of a Mike Judge (Office Space, Idiocracy) or a Blake Edwards (the Pink Panther collection), it could have been great.

If you want to seem like some quasi intellectual to impress a date or someone from the chardonnay drinking and chicken salad eating crowd you might do well to bring this old dog out of retirement.  The bottom line is that Bananas was not crap but not quite a rose either.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on November 11, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

I Can’t Believe They Put “Miami Vice” On This Movie.

I don’t know if I mentioned this before, but we are not limited here to current movies, we will talk about and rate movies from any and all time periods, genres and national origins.  Today we go back to 2006 and the 1980’s when we look at Miami Vice the movie.

I am shocked that Michael Mann, maker of the great series that defined the 1980’s Miami Vice (Don Johnson and Phillip Michael Thomas) directed the 2006 big screen version of the classic TV show.  How could someone who created the original Manhunter (1986) fall from grace so quickly?

Not only were the performances by Jamie Foxx and Colin Farrell so terrible that they should be arrested for bad acting, but I still don’t know what the movie is actually about—and I watched it several times to try and figure it out.

I know movies are a time for a break from reality, but this movie would have you believe Crocket and Tubs are some form of super cop, racing boats in the opening scene, driving Ferraris like Mario Andretti and then flying an Adam A500 twin piston engine plane— a rare plane (a little more than ½ a dozen were made) that is almost considered a light jet.  I mean come on, choose one maybe two out of the three but that is it.

Miami Vice (2006) serves as the foundation of the dung heap, I wanted my two hours back and so will you.

 
5 Comments

Posted by on November 4, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

I Really Should Explain the Rating System.

I realized that I had not formally explained how we rate movies here.  Well here we go, the JPF I’m Outta Here Movie Thoughts movie ratings scheme.  Going from a bad/crap movie to a great movie we have:

  • (1) The dung heap, if a movie is in the dung heap . . . well I think it is self-explanatory;
  • (2) Not crap.  If a movie is not crap that is the equivalent of the Catholic Church’s purgatory, not so bad but not great; then
  • (3) The rose.  If you remember our first post we are in search of those beautiful roses that grow out of the dung heaps.  If a movie gets a rose, watch it and (hopefully) you will enjoy.

Well that is it, pretty simple huh?

J.P.

 
2 Comments

Posted by on October 30, 2009 in Movie Reviews

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,