When the discussion of Femme Fatale films came up the first movie we here at JPFmovies immediately thought of was The Last Seduction. Many of you probably never heard of it because even though Fiorentino’s performance generated talk of an Oscar nomination, she was deemed ineligible because the film was shown on HBO before it was released into the theaters. October Films and ITC Entertainment sued the Academy, but were unable to make Fiorentino eligible for a nomination. So, the film went right from HBO to DVD—what a waste.
To say The Last Seduction is a neo-noir erotic thriller doesn’t do the film justice. It is an outstanding example modernizing the traditional stereotype of the deadly women of classic fim noir that were generally disliked, detested, and sometimes hated by patriarchal society. Here the Director and Fiorentino bring some of the enduring cultural images of the femme fatale while bestowing her with modern, distinguishing characteristics.
The film opens with, Bridget Gregory (Fiorentino) pressuring and scolding the salesmen in some boiler-room telemarketing office in New York City selling worthless coins. She knows how to use the hard sell, close deals, and manage men with fear and degradation. She runs a tight and ruthless ship. After work, she races to her apartment to see if an important deal her medical school husband made selling $700,000 worth of pharmaceutical grade cocaine to some street thugs paid off. It did, the husband (Bill Pullman) had to stuff the 700K in his jacket on the way home, After Bridget makes some rude remark to her husband, he gives her a pretty good smack across the face which seems to set the wheels of this tale of deceit in motion.
While her husband is taking a shower, Bridge to use a phrase from the Steve Miller Band “go on take the money and run.” Naturally her husband is upset but does not seemed too surprised.
On her way to Chicago, Bridget stops in a small town called Beston to gas up. It’s in a nearby bar that we – and Bridget – meet the film’s third principal character, Mike Swale (played to naive, lustful perfection by Peter Berg). In the bar, Bridget’s order is ignored by the bartender, and, instantly attracted to her dark good looks, Mike Swale gallantly steps in to help. Bridget, however, is not interested. “Could you leave? Please?” she asks. “Well, I haven’t finished charming you yet,” Mike responds, to which Bridget retorts: “You haven’t started.” Still endeavoring to win Bridget’s heart – or some part of her – Mike informs her that he’s “hung like a horse.” Perhaps wishing only to amuse herself, perhaps with other, more far-reaching plans in mind, Bridget asks to see for herself, unzips his pants right in the bar, and then fires off a series of questions: how many lovers has he had? Have any been prostitutes? Does he have his own place? Does it have indoor plumbing? Before long, the two are in Mike’s apartment. He is now under her spell.
As the movie progresses, an evil disorder dwells deep within Bridget. She seems to scorn men. She uses men to her advantage, catching them, conquering them, and bending them to her will. She values money, power, and independence over relationships. She enjoys humiliating men, deriding them as ‘eunuchs,’ ‘Neanderthals,’ ‘maggots,’ and ‘sex objects.’ A trace of revenge lurks in Bridget’s behavior towards the opposite sex.
Bridget continues to exhibit her psychopathic behavior, cunning and naked ambition. As the film progresses we see that Bridget Gregory, is total bitch. Hot, genius smart, kinky and slinky. Feline and ruthless. Politically incorrect chain smoker. New York City telemarketer/con artist. Catty call floor conniver. Rough Rider floor boss. And I mean all of that as a compliment.
Interesting enough we try to find a linkable character in the film but no one comes to this dance with clean hands.
We could go on for pages but there will be no spoilers here. You need to make the time watch The Last Seduction, you are getting the JPFmovie seal of approval that it is worth watching.
Bonnie at Tarot Salve
July 14, 2017 at 2:46 pm
The best villain is the one you love. And the best film is the one that turns classic stereotypes on their heads and inside out. This movie offers both those things! I loved Linda Fiorentino’s character, and I especially loved that she treated men the way, stereotypically, men have traditionally treated women. Yes, she has an evil side–but as you note, that’s what we can’t help loving about her.
Besides, it’s not so much that she’s evil–it’s more that she just doesn’t care. You’ve reviewed movies that had truly evil characters in them: torturers, for example. Fiorentino’s character is not evil on that scale.
It’s interesting, though, isn’t it, that her character is pretty plain to the men in her life, but they are still drawn to her like a moth to a flame. It seems as if, just as women supposedly love the bad boys, men love the bitches (though that won’t stop them from complaining about how they get treated by them). Maybe there’s chemistry in danger. (That draw is an illusion, though, in my opinion. The moth may be drawn to the flame initially, but doesn’t enjoy being burned in it. Both men and women are happier when they don’t get burned.)
Without going too far, because like you I don’t want to spoil the ending, let me suggest that viewers of this movie should consider just what it is that makes Fiorentino’s character evil. I’d argue that the most disturbing thing about her is not that she doesn’t care, and it’s not the way she treats men. It’s that she reweaves the fabric of reality like a spider spinning a new web, one she likes better than the old one.
For readers of this comment who haven’t seen the movie–see it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
jpfmovies
July 15, 2017 at 1:50 am
All good points, why am I not shocked at the emphasis point of view expressed in this comment?
LikeLike